Growth: Solutions We Love
- Stop Planting Trees聽
- Share
Stop Planting Trees聽
Long touted as an environmental panacea, mass tree planting can actually do more harm than good.
There鈥檚 a lot to love about trees. They filter the air, provide habitat, and cool down cities. The planet鈥檚 3 trillion trees anchor complex ecosystems and suck up 30% of carbon emissions from burning fossil fuels.
That鈥檚 why there are calls for mass tree planting to cover 25% more of Earth鈥檚 surface, and governments have pledged to add a trillion new trees. Stewarding existing forests is an important climate solution, but planting trees to cancel out emissions is not.
Tree-planting projects create monocultures, not complex natural forest ecosystems. Monocultures do not support wildlife and are more vulnerable to disease, insect infestations, and wildfires.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9919a/9919a93b6dd69a81c594031f8c63aa037d4d10c0" alt="Illustrated pine trees serve as the background for the following text:
Where grasslands and agricultural lands were converted to forest, 52% of streams shrank and 13% of streams dried up for at least a year. Source: Science
Healthy natural forests sequester 40 times more carbon than tree plantations. Source: Nature."
Adding trees to grasslands and wetlands exacerbates biodiversity loss, absorbs (rather than reflects) solar radiation, and draws huge quantities of water.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/21180/2118072388f1932f7bdd86d3bcaeddcf10212d60" alt="Text overlaid on illustrated tree background reads:
After 30 years of tree planting in the tropical savanna off Brazil, savanna ants declined by 86%, and savanna plants declined by 67%. Savanna ants are ecosystem engineers and an important indicator species. Source: Science Advances.
Grasslands are the better bet for carbon sinks. While trees mostly store carbon above ground, in leaves and woody biomass, grasses store carbon in roots and soil, where they can't burn. Source: Env. Research Letters."
Today鈥攁nd especially in a hotter future鈥攖rees are not reliable carbon storage.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9b11a/9b11aaf24a56d0f066b9fd6ffc1421ebaadc45ab" alt="An illustrated burning forest appears above text reading: Because of wildfires and insect infestations, Canada's managed forest land has been a net carbon sink since 2001. Source: CBC News.
Illustrated kelp and seagrass appears below text reading: Coastal wetlands store carbon-rich plant matter underwater, where it can't decompose and release carbon. As sea levels rise, these environments will actually be able to store more carbon. Source: Nature."
Tree-planting programs harm vulnerable populations. Targeting farmland for tree planting triggers food shortages, forced migration, and violent evictions of Indigenous peoples. Poorly designed tree subsidies wreak havoc in poorer economies.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aaedb/aaedb32c2389fe2f1f55042c06bb3c432c5cdc03" alt="An illustrated bulldozer carries away the final tree of a clear-cut forest. Text above the illustration reads: Mexico's $3.4-billion reforestation program paid 420,000 farmers $213 a month to plant trees. But they cut down 280 square miles of mature jungle鈥攁n area the size of New York City鈥攖o do so. Plus, up to an estimated 90% of the newly planted trees died. Source: Bloomberg."
Cheap tree offsets distract us from the hard work of reducing consumption. Corporations and governments won鈥檛 invest in expensive carbon reduction projects when they can win public favor and pay for their carbon sins by planting trees instead.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63f84/63f84ad9ff385f8b631f34d5d2d888099dab0ab4" alt="An illustrated parent and child dig nearby and water a trio of saplings. Text above shows a bar graph reading: Estimated mean project cost per ton of CO2 emissions mitigated: By mass transit: $1,288. By tree planting: $12. Source: Center for Global Development."