精东影业

When most people聽are introduced to abolition, they first want to know how prison-industrial-complex abolitionists propose handling violence in a world without police or prisons. These conversations often become extreme: What about rape, murder, and hate crimes? What if the victim were a member of your family? Though it might not seem this way, we聽already聽have many choices to consider when reacting to violence, but society urges us to make the same choice over and over again: Call the police, demand vengeance, and hide 鈥渆vil鈥� people away in prisons. What would happen if we made a different choice? Abolitionists Josie Duffy Rice and Mariame Kaba have been instrumental in imagining what accountability鈥攏ot punishment鈥攚ould look like for communities that see harm as an everyday occurrence if we saw people as whole human beings instead of categorizing them as 鈥済ood鈥� or 鈥渆vil.鈥�

This isn鈥檛 necessarily easy work, because vengeance can feel good, and accountability, forgiveness, and growth can be painful, but that doesn鈥檛 make the work any less worthwhile. By exploring and engaging the different choices, we open ourselves up to the possibility of a world where our so-called justice system isn鈥檛 built around the worst-case scenario. If we commit to abolishing death-making institutions (as Kaba calls them) and instead build those that are life-giving, we might not be so married to revenge and punishment. We could acknowledge and sit with the fact that we all cause harm and that no system will prevent that. Instead, we could think up imaginative ways to prevent and deal with harm鈥攚ays that don鈥檛 exacerbate it. In this conversation, Kaba and Rice discuss how we can move toward this goal, beginning with being accountable to our immediate communities.鈥擱eina Sultan

Josie Duffy Rice: I went to one of the smaller sessions you were running at the  in 2019, and we had a talk about what accountability means. You were like, 鈥淟et鈥檚 talk about a real-life situation.鈥� The situation was: You鈥檙e in your apartment, and you hear a domestic conflict happening downstairs. What do you do? It was such an effective way to bring home the importance of thinking through some of the more complicated questions about abolition. Is that a question you normally ask when you鈥檙e facilitating?

Mariame Kaba: Yes, I use that example when I鈥檓 facilitating workshops. Nearly all of us have had some experience where violence is happening around us and we have to make a choice. We can figure out a way to intervene, or we can choose to have no reaction at all. Both of those are choices. You鈥檝e made a decision that you鈥檙e not going to do anything, and that puts us square in the middle of having to reconcile our values with our actions. I also ask this question because every time I talk about prison-industrial-complex abolition, the visceral reaction is, 鈥淏ut what about: insert a form of violence that folks feel like they have to confront.鈥�

I find it interesting that that鈥檚 where we go when we鈥檙e confronted with having to deal with violence in our everyday lives, with the systems that abolitionists want to see eliminated. It鈥檚 an understandable and normal response to the current moment we鈥檙e living in. It鈥檚 also a strange response because all of the scenarios they鈥檙e asking about are happening right now. So asking, 鈥淗ow do you deal with it right now?鈥� forces us to have a conversation about what the 鈥渟ystems鈥濃�擨 call them 鈥渄eath-making institutions鈥濃�攁re actually doing for us. Why can鈥檛 one of the responses be intervening as someone who has a modicum of a relationship with [the people in conflict]? That example helps us confront the fear, which we all have. We haven鈥檛 done a risk assessment, so we鈥檙e fearful of intervening. That question forces us to think about what it would take for us to feel more comfortable in intervening. What do we need to overcome that fear?

Let鈥檚 work on building that, whether it鈥檚 building new skills or developing a new social relationship with our neighbors鈥攖he proactive things that we ought to be doing all the time so we can be responders to the harms that occur in our communities. Maybe you have a phone tree in your building so if you heard something like that, you know who to call and ask, 鈥淎re you hearing this too? Maybe we should go together.鈥� There are concrete ways of trying to intervene.

Rice: The closer of a community you build, the more you know your neighbors, and the more you understand them as real people with real conflict. It鈥檚 a different thing to get into an argument with strangers than with people who like you and respect you. That example undergirds this idea that we really have this transactional relationship with accountability

Kaba: It鈥檚 good to talk about what accountability is and isn鈥檛 because that also has a lot to do with where we are as a society. There鈥檚 an assumption that being anti-punishment means that you鈥檙e not pro-accountability; that couldn鈥檛 be further from the truth. Most people who subscribe to an abolitionist vision have come to understand accountability as it鈥檚 defined by Connie Burk, [former director of ], who has spent decades addressing domestic violence in the LGBTQ community. Years ago, Connie wrote an essay that references the , 鈥淲hat do we mean when we talk about accountability?鈥� , who also worked for many years at the NW Network, expanded that vision to talk about self-accountability. Connie frames accountability as an internal resource for recognizing and redressing the harms we have caused to ourselves and others. Accountability is an active process through which people have to make a decision that they recognize the harms that are occurring, they want to try to redress them, and they鈥檙e thinking about the harms through the lens of what鈥檚 been done to others but also what鈥檚 been done to them. That鈥檚 really challenging because everything in our culture is about coercion; dangling the idea of punishment is meant to keep you on the 鈥渞ight path.鈥� Within the culture we have, there鈥檚 very little incentive to take accountability for anything

Danielle Sered鈥檚 [2019] book, , breaks down the concept of accountability. [She writes], 鈥淎ccountability is the corollary to grief for those of us who are responsible for harm, and it is as essential as a grieving process is in restoring us to our best selves.鈥� That encapsulates why we need a reframing of what we mean when we talk about accountability. It should be something that鈥檚 desirable. Perez-Darby talks about it as a process we do with ourselves for ourselves. When we鈥檙e being accountable to ourselves, we鈥檙e acting in a way that honors our values. We鈥檙e acting with integrity by taking responsibility for who we are in the world and for living in alignment with our values. I鈥檓 responsible to myself, but I鈥檓 also responsible to those who are around me for the consequences of my choices.

Rice: In some ways, accountability is a gift. When we talk about accountability, we鈥檙e saying accountability is not just important and necessary, but a gift. It鈥檚 something that we should embrace. We鈥檙e not perfect; we鈥檙e going to make mistakes, and we鈥檙e going to hurt people. But we should embrace the fact that we have the ability to be more accountable today than we were yesterday.

Kaba: Absolutely. As we鈥檙e talking, people might be wondering: Now I understand that you can鈥檛 coerce people into taking accountability. They might now be convinced that they need a different frame. That鈥檚 the first step, and people like Mia Mingus and Mimi Kim and other practitioners of transformative justice tell us that there are a couple of other steps in the process. Mia talks about accountability having four parts: self-reflection, apology, repair, and changed behavior. Accountability is not just apologizing for doing something that鈥檚 harmful to people; self-reflection [increases] understanding of the impact of your actions. It鈥檚 hard work to take accountability for the actions you鈥檝e taken, reflect about why you did what you did, craft a good apology, seek to repair that harm, and then actually change your behavior. It takes so much commitment to change your behavior.

Rice: I think about how much harm people inflict before they have any language for it. Young people are just starting to navigate their emotional range. I think about a lot of the women鈥檚 groups I used to sit in on and how many of them talked about this traumatic experience they had in high school. There鈥檚 this sense that so much time has passed, I didn鈥檛 really know what I was doing, and I was so young. There鈥檚 this thought process that if I didn鈥檛 intend harm, then I don鈥檛 have to be accountable for it.

Kaba: People think accountability is an event, which comes back to being a 鈥済ood person.鈥� I don鈥檛 think there are good people. There are people who do good and bad things. I think about that all the time because people think accountability is an event rather than an ongoing, minute-by-minute choice. This is also what you see in these 鈥渄ecisions鈥� made by people inside these death-making institutions, where people can literally convince themselves that they鈥檙e taking actions that are supposedly neutral because they have to [follow] the law. It鈥檚 just so much easier to turn back and rely on the rules. All the stuff we鈥檙e talking about is hard to do, and a lot of people just don鈥檛 want to do hard work.

Rice: Right. I think about that story about the  who was on his fourth day of work when he answered the call about George Floyd. And here鈥檚 the man who trained him standing in front of him, killing someone. We all want to think that we would say, 鈥淪top it right now. He鈥檚 dying.鈥� But very few of us would do that. The guy who鈥檚 training you has been on the force for 20 years. Are you really going to be the one to tell him? [When a man] experiences this horrible thing without the emotional reaction, [they鈥檙e told] that鈥檚 what being a real man is and being a real cop is. I was reading that article about [that cop], and I was feeling so sad because it talks about how his siblings are understandably done with him.

Kaba: I get the sibling thing on a reflexive level. But guess what? He鈥檚 your responsibility too. Being a cop is a bad move, but even with that I have empathy because I鈥檝e taken jobs that haven鈥檛 been the best jobs. But again, this is where accountability can be such a gift because it鈥檚 hard for us to see ourselves clearly. We need to be building support in our lives and have people in our lives who can support us in the hard work of doing accountability. It makes a difference, by the way, when my brother says, 鈥淵ou know, that鈥檚 just not cool.鈥� I respect him. I love him. I want to remain in relationship with him. And if he says, 鈥淵ou could have done so much better here,鈥� that鈥檚 hugely consequential to my behavior because I don鈥檛 want to disappoint him. When you cut somebody off who did a terrible thing, that person is now dangling in the wind. The person鈥檚 going to be so ashamed, and when you鈥檙e dealing with shame, you鈥檙e just consumed by that feeling of wanting to close yourself off.

Rice: You just want it to be over. When we think about this guy, the cops are around him telling him that what they did is OK. That鈥檚 what this 鈥渂rotherhood鈥� really is. We won鈥檛 abandon you unless you sell us out. Instead of having family, siblings, or friends around who say, 鈥淗ere鈥檚 what you could have done better,鈥� he鈥檒l just have cops telling him that what he did was right. It鈥檚 easy to cut people out because it鈥檚 easy to imagine that that鈥檚 accountability. It鈥檚 much harder to say, 鈥淚鈥檓 not trying to kick you out or cut you off. If you haven鈥檛 already done the work, then you can鈥檛 really make the road in the crisis. I wonder if this goes back to the worst-case scenario, like the minute you talk about abolition, people automatically [go to] murder and rape. I can鈥檛 even imagine what kinds of things have been in your inbox these past few months, but I can guess it鈥檚 a lot of, 鈥淲ait until you get raped or someone kills your kid.鈥� We don鈥檛 build systems around the worst.

Kaba: Why orient a system around the worst of the worst? That makes no sense, when the vast majority of people who commit harm are not Ted Bundy.

Rice: Maybe if we had a better system, Ted Bundy wouldn鈥檛 be Ted Bundy. Bundy killed 40 people before we got him. So that system wasn鈥檛 supposed to be the solution; it didn鈥檛 stop 40 murders.

Kaba: We get to know about serial killers from a concerted effort by mass media and popular culture to tell you that鈥檚 the norm, but the vast majority of people who kill somebody else are people who know one another. It isn鈥檛 some serial rapist who鈥檚 going to rape you; it鈥檚 your uncle or your aunt, your father or your mother or your best friend, and I don鈥檛 think people can compute that.

Rice: Part of life is understanding that you don鈥檛 have all the control, that something can go wrong and bad things can still happen to good people. There鈥檚 something freeing in the fact that we can鈥檛 control everything, and the point of being a healthy, accountable person isn鈥檛 because it will definitely benefit us on the back end. It might hurt us.

Kaba: What is it that you want to control? I find that what we鈥檙e trying to control isn鈥檛 actually useful. We have this whole way that you could create a proactive space and community within your direct family unit and the people around you. You could be building pods right now, which you have total control over. This is part of what transformative community accountability forces us to do. Figure out who you鈥檙e going to turn to when harm happens to you, and also who you鈥檙e going to turn to when you cause harm. That鈥檚 actually in your control. Why aren鈥檛 you working on that? It goes back to what makes a lot of people uncomfortable about prison-industrial-complex abolitionists: None of us is above causing harm.

Rice: Think about the infinite decisions you make day after day and the decisions that you don鈥檛 make. The decisions you don鈥檛 make to go check on your neighbors or help a person or an organization. The potential for harm is infinite. We鈥檙e all gonna harm something or someone.

Kaba: Let鈥檚 say I鈥檓 in a situation where it鈥檚 me or somebody else; I might very well kill somebody. It鈥檚 situational, contextual, and not about some deep moral failing on my part. A lot of times violence is so situational that we have to also be accounting for that when we鈥檙e trying to make sense of all of this. I love working with others to think about the actual practices of accountability, whether it鈥檚 listening to people we鈥檝e harmed, honoring the needs and self-determination of the people who鈥檝e been harmed, or thinking about and enacting our boundaries. Inevitable harms are going to happen, but you should have more tools to respond to them before they escalate. When a lot of people hear about prison-industrial-complex abolition, [their response is], 鈥淗ow dare you act like there isn鈥檛 such a thing as evil?鈥� Even if I believed in evil people, to think that I need to subscribe to having death-making torture chambers as a way to 鈥渉andle鈥� those evil people makes no sense.

Rice: One of the things I keep thinking about is . There鈥檚 no justice for Breonna Taylor. She鈥檚 dead. I understand why people want the cops [who killed her] in prison, but even if we hold [these cops] accountable, she鈥檚 gone. People talk about prison-industrial-complex abolitionists being idealistic, but they鈥檙e also talking about justice for a woman who was shot and killed in her bed.

Kaba: There鈥檚 also this idea that justice looks like locking people up in cages. It鈥檚 my belief that [locking people up in cages] won鈥檛 actually transform the harms that have occurred. I鈥檓 going to work really hard to make sure that the cages, [the] cameras, and the cops are gone. That鈥檚 my work, but it doesn鈥檛 have to be yours. This doesn鈥檛 mean that I won鈥檛 support Breonna鈥檚 family in other ways that don鈥檛 conflict with my value system. We can walk part of the way with people without walking all the way. I don鈥檛 believe that being a friend of yours means that I have to support your feelings of vengeance. I have to support you as you鈥檙e navigating things; that may look like sleeping on your couch for several days, cooking you dinner, doing your errands, and maybe accompanying you to court if that鈥檚 something that could be useful. I don鈥檛 have to cosign your feelings of vengeance to be a good friend. I saw someone tweet that people like how abolition sounds but love what vengeance feels like. That鈥檚 exactly right.

was originally published in the Monster issue of Bitch magazine, published by . It has been republished here with permission.