Throughout the book, Giovale faces the dark truths about her European ancestors and pushes through to see an opportunity to create a new way of being and thinking. She explores and acknowledges the atrocities committed by her European ancestors toward Indigenous peoples, the impacts on her own identity as a white person, and the systemic perpetuation of this violence. In doing so, she creates a blueprint for European-descended people living in America to examine their own role in white supremacy鈥攁nd to heal. 

Read an excerpt from Becoming a Good Relative here.

By embarking on a journey of rekindling ancestral memories, Giovale uncovers the hidden stories and legacies of her own lineage鈥攅ven those that involve the perpetration of harm or complicity in injustice. She dives deep into the historical context that led her Irish ancestors to emigrate to the United States, including the British settlement of Ireland in the 1600s and its deliberate attack on Irish culture and systems of governance as a means to dissolve communities from within. Generations later, British rule exacerbated the already catastrophic Irish potato blight, resulting in mass forced migration to the U.S., where Irish immigrants were labeled dirty and dangerous. This was the inflection point where Irish immigrants assimilated to American whiteness, leaving behind cultural traditions and practices that connected them to their heritage. That assimilation also required the once-othered Irish to participate in and perpetuate harm and violence toward other U.S. communities deemed 鈥渘on-white.鈥�

Ancestral aversion is a common experience鈥攖he urge to sever ties with the parts of ourselves that relate to painful histories. Yet Giovale urges her white peers to examine their own lineage as a way to build empathy and compassion for their ancestors. While she does not excuse or justify the harms of her ancestors, Giovale shares a road map for forgiveness, a critical first step in creating a personal reparations plan. This process of exploring ancestral narratives can create healing across generations and enable a deeper understanding of how historical traumas continue to impact individuals and societies today.

Giovale鈥檚 depiction of her family鈥檚 history draws not-so-subtle connections to other Indigenous peoples whose worlds have been destroyed time and time again by European colonizers. It also brings to mind the harmful narratives currently being perpetuated about migrants crossing our Southern border. This parallel is critical and has the power to catalyze healing on a tremendous scale. 

We need more white relatives to face their own truth, though doing so may bring immense discomfort. As we see on Giovale鈥檚 journey, it is only through this initial discomfort that she is able to achieve true growth, ultimately uncovering her own cultures and ancestral practices that have been tragically lost through colonization. It is optional for white folks to investigate their whiteness, and that itself is a privilege. Giovale acknowledges that it was many years into her own life until she was confronted by her whiteness, her ancestry, and her own role in white supremacy. 

In a time when division is the air we breathe, Giovale offers our white relatives an opportunity to stop the cycle of extraction, exploitation, and control, and embrace a worldview of human interconnectivity and mutual thriving. This is especially powerful for European-descended individuals who also have ancestors with Earth-based traditions and beliefs, whose ways of being were destroyed through the same colonialist mindsets that created the environment we live in today.  

Giovale鈥檚 story reminds us that discomfort begets connection. Her encounters with Indigenous people from around the world, and her exploration of how their practices can be applied to her own life and lineage, illuminate our commonalities鈥攁nd our relatedness. Her journey, and this book, demonstrates a deep truth: All our suffering is mutual鈥攁nd so is our healing.

Hell鈥檚 Kitchen, the loosely based on Alicia Keys鈥� upbringing, follows 17-year-old Ali (Maleah Joi Moon) as she searches for purpose and freedom in 鈥�90s Manhattan. Ali鈥檚 being raised by Jersey (Shoshana Bean), her overprotective single mother who Ali believes is 鈥渟uffocating鈥� her.

As a Black woman, who鈥檚 also biracial, grew up in the 鈥�90s, and navigated early adulthood in New York City, I was enthralled by the show鈥檚 colors and effervescent characters, some of whom have curly hair like mine. Within the musical, Keys鈥� familiar, soulful songs reverberate and shatter spaces that diminish women while making space for vulnerability to become the loudest melody.

While Hell鈥檚 Kitchen鈥檚 premise is promising, the perspective of Black women slowly withers away as other characters鈥� development and traumas are prioritized. When Ali meets Knuck (Chris Lee), a man who drums a bucket near her apartment, she develops a crush on him, though it is unclear why they鈥檝e fallen for each other. 鈥淲hat y鈥檃ll even got in common?鈥� Ali鈥檚 friends ask her, before saying, 鈥淒on鈥檛 waste energy on this.鈥�

Their relationship quickly becomes unhealthy: Ali follows him to his job at a construction site, while he lurks outside her apartment. Though Jersey says they are 鈥渂abies in grown-up bodies,鈥� the reality is Knuck is in his 20s, while Ali has just barely passed the. Their relationship reaches a boiling point when Ali sneaks Knuck into her apartment when her mother鈥檚 not home. Though Knuck knows he shouldn鈥檛 be there, the musical portrays Ali as the sexual instigator: 鈥淸Jersey鈥檚] at work, we got plenty of time,鈥� she tells Knuck. 鈥淟et鈥檚 do it, baby.鈥�

When Jersey walks in on them, she calls the police, who arrest Knuck without explicitly charging him with a crime. Since Ali supposedly didn鈥檛 tell Knuck her actual age and Black men, including Knuck, are overpoliced, Jersey鈥檚 actions are framed as a betrayal. 鈥淓very time she [Jersey] tries to speak to me, I remember what she did to Knuck,鈥� Ali says.

In her angst, Ali turns to her piano teacher, Miss Liza Jane (Kecia Lewis), who belts a heart-wrenching tribute to her son and all the Black people who have been murdered by the police. However, juxtaposing Jane鈥檚 son鈥檚 murder with Knuck鈥檚 arrest feels manipulative, especially considering that .

Both realities can be true: Knuck鈥檚 history with the police is dehumanizing, and Ali鈥檚 unspoken trauma in her problematic affair with him (and within systems) also matters. By prioritizing one struggle over another, Black women鈥檚 traumas, triumphs, and stories are silenced. In essence, Ali becomes an audience member鈥攁 vessel for the people and systems around her rather than a stand-alone character. I left the theater asking, 鈥淲ho鈥檚 Ali? Why was she portrayed that way?鈥�

Theater鈥檚 Minstrel Show Roots

Theater鈥檚 depiction of Black women has deep roots in that reinforced Jim Crow segregation and reduced Black people to stereotypes. In a 2011 paper, historian , Ph.D., writes that these shows fueled negative characterizations of Black women in theater and broader culture, including perpetuating stereotypes such as the oversexualized, aggressive 鈥渏ezebel鈥� and the 鈥渕ammy,鈥� who鈥檚 a 鈥渘atural caretaker.鈥�

In the 1960s and 鈥�70s, Black women playwrights began producing plays that resisted these dehumanizing characteristics and offered a more layered worldview. 鈥淲omen playwrights of the Black Arts Movement followed a tradition of Black women intellectuals who actively resisted controlling images of Black womanhood,鈥� writes La Donna L. Forsgren, Ph.D., in her 2018 book, . Rather than reinforcing 鈥渄istorted images of Black womanhood,鈥� these playwrights, including Pearl Cleage and Ntozake Shange, used art to challenge and complicate the portrayal of Black women as 鈥渟capegoats for the ills within Black communities.鈥�

Forsgren argues that through plays such as For Colored Girls Who Have Considered Suicide / When the Rainbow Is Enuf (1976) and Mad at Miles: A Blackwoman鈥檚 Guide to Truth (1990), playwrights began focusing more on Black families rather than solely Black men while also revealing hidden truths about Black women鈥檚 traumas and joys.

There might be no better example of this approach than The Color Purple, an award-winning play adapted from Alice Walker鈥檚 Pulitzer Prize鈥搘inning 1982 book that explores three Black women鈥檚 experiences with sexism, racism, and intimate-partner violence. While the book鈥檚 film adaptation in 1985 for its portrayal of Black men, remains a touchstone for Black women seeking understanding of themselves and their experiences.

鈥淲hen it was first released in 1985, The Color Purple was a cinematic outlier,鈥� NPR host Aisha Harris notes in a . 鈥淔or the first time, many Black women saw a movie that reflected their own experiences at home. Characters like Celie and the free-spirited Shug, who鈥檚 played by Margaret Avery, or Sofia, the self-assured force of nature who鈥檚 played by Oprah Winfrey. They were women who had seen or experienced abuse firsthand and pushed to seek happiness in spite of it all.鈥�

Yet even plays that don鈥檛 feature explicit stereotypes about Black women can be harmful. In the musical Hamilton, Sally Hemings, the woman Thomas Jefferson enslaved, was only portrayed briefly caring for Jefferson. Also, the young Maria Reynolds (white in real life, but not in Hamilton) seduces the older Hamilton鈥攂efore trapping him in a scandal, the very epitome of the 鈥渏ezebel.鈥�

While not all theater characters require tragic backstories, plays should depict Black women as layered鈥攏ot foil characters.

Trauma-Informed Theater Practices

Though musicals purvey joy, there鈥檚 also a responsibility to be trauma-informed. Theater productions should consult mental health professionals, scholars, and even members of the production itself. In May, , Hell鈥檚 Kitchen鈥檚 lead actor, publicly revealed her battles with depression. 鈥淚 wasn鈥檛 getting out of bed,鈥� she told The New York Times. 鈥淚 was missing class 鈥� it got really bad.鈥� Imagine if Moon, with this lived experience, helped write Ali鈥檚 journey. 

Broadway plays haven鈥檛 often done this work, though the jukebox musical Jagged Little Pill is an exception. In 2021, after the play鈥檚 producers , they and revisited the script. They also with mental health organizations, recognizing the impact that theater has on trauma. 鈥淲e are very proud of the show we made and its transformative power,鈥� the lead producers said in a statement. 鈥淚t is precisely because we have made this show about these charged and nuanced issues鈥攁 show about radical empathy and truth-telling, about protest and vulnerability鈥攚e have to hold ourselves to a higher standard.鈥�

Even if Hell鈥檚 Kitchen鈥檚 writer, Kristoffer D铆az, isn鈥檛 solely responsible for Ali鈥檚 character arc, playwrights should be trained to understand trauma responses so they can better be conveyed onstage. Perhaps Ali made these choices because women often blame themselves for trauma鈥攂ecause it gives them control when the world feels out of control.

Imagine if Miss Liza Jane told Ali that she wasn鈥檛 responsible for Knuck鈥檚 trauma and suggested support beyond the piano? What if playwrights held characters like Knuck accountable and showed how systems and environments inform a character鈥檚 choices? 

There are some organizations, coalitions, and producers attempting to address these issues, including , , , and

In 2020, after the murder of George Floyd, more than 300 theatermakers of color released 鈥�,鈥� a statement demanding 鈥渁 more equitable and safe space for BIPOC communities in our nation and inside of the American Theater.鈥� The statement鈥攚hich holds the theater industry accountable for actions such as dangling 鈥渙pportunities like carrots before emerging BIPOC artists 鈥� at the expense of [their] art and integrity鈥濃�攐ffers a number of demands. One such demand is for productions to 鈥減rovide therapists or counselors on site for the duration of a rehearsal process and production run when producing/programming content that deals with racialized experiences, and most especially racialized trauma.鈥� Another demand asks for theater companies to diversify the plays they offer by not having the BIPOC plays in any given season centered solely on 鈥渢rauma and pain.鈥�

If Hell鈥檚 Kitchen is any indication, theater is still struggling to meet these proposed standards more than four years later. While more than 100 theater organizations have 鈥攎aking changes that lessen the harm BIPOC performers, producers, and directors experience鈥攖here is still more work to do to create a more equitable theater industry.

Theater professionals don鈥檛 just imitate life鈥攖hey shape it. Keys said she crafted Hell鈥檚 Kitchen , so its writing should remind audiences that women鈥檚 inner 鈥溾�� of bright colors shouldn鈥檛 dim because people around them are struggling to find theirs.

In a quip that launched a million memes, Minnesota Governor鈥搕urned鈥揤P candidate Tim Walz referred to his right-wing political opposition as 鈥渨eird people鈥� in a July 23, 2024, .

Since then, the barb has stuck, with leading Democratic party figures, from Senate Majority Leader to presidential nominee , branding their Republican opposition with the moniker.

Of course, in a classic deployment of the 鈥淚 know you are, but what am I?鈥� retort, the Republicans have tried to flip the script.

鈥淵ou know what鈥檚 really weird?鈥� . 鈥淪oft on crime politicians like Kamala allowing illegal aliens out of prison so they can violently assault Americans.鈥� And in an interview with conservative radio host Clay Travis, , 鈥淭hey鈥檙e the weird ones. Nobody鈥檚 ever called me weird. I鈥檓 a lot of things, but weird I鈥檓 not.鈥�

While I get why both sides are hurling weird bombs at each other, I鈥檓 nevertheless not on board with all the 鈥渨eird shaming.鈥� It isn鈥檛 just hypocritical for each party to claim to speak on behalf of the forgotten and marginalized while mockingly calling the other side 鈥渨eird.鈥� It鈥檚 also deeply regressive.

The weird, I would argue, deserve respect. As someone who has spent the past three decades researching, writing about, and teaching topics including vampires, ghosts, monsters, cult films, and what gets categorized as 鈥渨eird fiction,鈥� .

鈥淲yrd鈥� History

When politicians use the term weird, they鈥檙e trying to depict their opponents as odd or strange. However, the origins of the term are much more expansive and profound.

The Old English wyrd, from which the contemporary usage is derived, in fact was a noun corresponding to fate or destiny. 鈥溾�� signified the forces directing the course of human affairs鈥攁n understanding reflected, for example, by Shakespeare鈥檚 three prophetic 鈥渨eird sisters鈥� in . An individual鈥檚 鈥渨eird鈥� was their fate, while use of the term weird as an adjective connoted the supernatural power to manipulate human destiny.

Despite the progressive generalization of the term to refer to all things strange, fantastic, and unusual, resonances of the weird鈥檚 鈥渨yrd鈥� origins are retained by what has come to be called 鈥�,鈥� a subgenre of speculative fiction.

The weird tale, explained early 20th-century writer in his 1927 treatise 鈥�,鈥� is one that challenges our taken-for-granted understandings of how the world works. It does this through鈥攖o use Lovecraft鈥檚 characteristic purple prose鈥攁 鈥渕align and particular suspension or defeat of those fixed laws of Nature which are our only safeguards against the assaults of chaos and the daemons of unplumbed space.鈥�

The weird tale pushes back against human pretensions of grandeur, hinting at just how much we don鈥檛 know about the universe and just how precarious our situation truly is.

Meanwhile, the freaks, geeks, outsiders, misfits, and mavericks are weirdos who push back in a different way. They are the nonconformists whom, as Ralph Waldo Emerson pointed out in his 1841 essay 鈥�,鈥� 鈥渢he world whips 鈥� with its displeasure.鈥�

Where would we be, I wonder, without the artists and scientists and thinkers developing 鈥渨eird鈥� ideas and unorthodox ways to see and appreciate the world?

In this sense, nearly all progress is part of weird history, propelled by visionaries frequently misunderstood in their own time.

From Denigration to Celebration

Of course, not all weirdos change the world through grand gestures and history-altering interventions; sometimes weirdos just do their own thing.

That, too, has been a large part of the story of the past century, as Western culture has increasingly鈥攊f reluctantly鈥攎ade room for once-unorthodox or even taboo forms of self-expression, to.

Proliferating subcultures, gender identities, and forms of self-expression鈥攁lthough no doubt propelled by capitalist market forces鈥攏evertheless demonstrate the premium placed today on individualism.

In fact, pop culture has been keen to invite historical weirdos back into the fold鈥攕o much so that vampires, ogres, and fairy-tale villains from 鈥淪leeping Beauty鈥� now enlist audiences鈥� sympathies by telling their side of the story.

The true villains are now often seen as those who demonize difference and insist on straight-jacketing individual freedom of expression. Many contemporary monsters aren鈥檛 bad, 鈥攁nd their monstrous behavior results from being bullied, excluded, insulted and rejected for being 鈥渨eird.鈥�

Reclaiming Weird

However sincerely felt, the Democrats鈥� deployment of the weird characterization is, of course, strategic.

Walz鈥檚 barb clearly managed to get under the skin of a crowd for whom the idea of not being 鈥渘ormal鈥� is apparently distressing鈥攁nd it is for this reason, I believe, that the Democrats have repeatedly tried to make the idea stick.

Historian of political rhetoric , 鈥淭he opposite of normalizing authoritarianism is to make it weird, to call it out and to sort of mock it.鈥� Said another way, to refer to your opposition and their policies as 鈥渨eird鈥� is to denigrate it as abnormal.

Political expediency, however, comes with consequences鈥攁nd here, much to my dismay, I find myself agreeing with Vivek Ramaswamy鈥攖he conservative entrepreneur who unsuccessfully ran for the Republican presidential nomination.

Ramaswamy that the weird insults are 鈥渁 tad ironic coming from the party that preaches 鈥榙iversity & inclusion.鈥欌�� Ironic puts it mildly.

This whole 鈥渢hey鈥檙e weird鈥� argument from the Democrats is dumb & juvenile. This is a presidential election, not a high school prom queen contest. It鈥檚 also a tad ironic coming from the party that preaches 鈥渄iversity & inclusion.鈥� Win on policy if you can, but cut the crap please.

— Vivek Ramaswamy (@VivekGRamaswamy)

While there may well be utility in deploying the term 鈥渨eird鈥� to frustrate political opponents, I鈥檇 prefer to reclaim the weird as something to appreciate, respect, and celebrate.

The weird is that which introduces cracks into the edifice of the status quo, liberating possibilities for different futures and forms of expression. There are many different, more specific adjectives politicians and others can use to characterize their rivals.

Let鈥檚 keep America weird.

This article is republished from under a Creative Commons license. Read the .

Published in 1993 and set in 2024鈥攖he protagonist鈥檚 first journal entry is July 20, 2024鈥攖he story imagines a highly capitalistic America, dominated by industry, corporate greed, and impending doom. At the time of its publication, the novel was categorized as dystopian fiction with a climate catastrophe twist, but Butler later self-labeled it as 鈥渟peculative fiction.鈥�&苍产蝉辫;

As our calendars finally catch up to the timeline of her imagination, Butler seems to have predicted many realities that are playing out this year in her novel. She did not shy away from being 鈥減olitical.鈥� Still, readers are left wondering what happens when science fiction resembles reality so uncannily. 

For young people, classified as 鈥淕en Z,鈥� the questions that Butler poses in her works are at the forefront of contemporary literature, exploring stories that are meant to illuminate, anger, and more importantly, liberate young people and lift up their causes.

Butler opens the novel in Robledo, a fictional suburb 20 minutes from inner-city Los Angeles, from behind the walls that surround the home of 15-year-old protagonist Lauren Olamina. The story鈥檚 narration by the teenage girl remains a key driver of the plot and resonates with Gen Z readers. 

Within the first few pages of the novel, Lauren pulls readers into a bleak futuristic version of L.A.: 

None of us goes out to school any more. 鈥ll the adults were armed. That鈥檚 the rule. Go out in a bunch, and go armed. 鈥o us kids鈥攎ost of us鈥攖he trip was just an adventure, an excuse to go outside the wall. 鈥e rode past people stretched out, sleeping on the sidewalks, and a few just waking up. 鈥 saw at least three people who weren鈥檛 going to wake up again, ever. 

These scenarios hit a little too close to home for Jordan Yanowitz, a 24-year-old from L.A. 鈥淚t resonates deeply with my appraisal of Los Angeles culture: reading this book in 2024 in this strange city鈥eeing a time and place where people have so much anger and angst鈥� and an environment where everyone feels so fundamentally unsafe in public that we isolate ourselves into insular communities and neighborhoods,鈥� he says in an email interview. Yanowitz, who graduated from UCLA with a degree in ecology and now works as a teacher鈥檚 assistant at the university, worries about 鈥渢he dog-eat-dog culture in which we live; it all feels very real for the contemporary cultural feeling of this town.鈥�

During a bike ride from the walled neighborhoods of Robledo into L.A., a rare occurrence for Lauren, readers learn about her unique condition. Lauren possesses the gift and curse of 鈥渉yperempathy,鈥� which allows her to feel, experience, and understand her surroundings more vividly than others. Hyperempathy guides Lauren鈥檚 choices, and she functions as a juxtaposition to her surroundings, seen most clearly in the way that she deals with grief and her ability to do so in a society that has normalized suffering. 

Lauren decides early on that she does not follow the same faith as her family, and she spends a large part of the book building upon her spiritual system, which she calls 鈥淓arthseed鈥� (hence the biblical word 鈥淧arable鈥� in the book鈥檚 title). Maybe this is Lauren acting as a typically rebellious teenage girl, or perhaps Butler imagined Earthseed as an applicable manifesto to current society, with change at its forefront.  

鈥淚 felt an immense kinship with Lauren Olamina,鈥� says 26-year-old Kathleen Gekiere from Oregon. 鈥淭hese books have spoken to me at difficult times in my life when I was questioning things that were very foundational to me.鈥� Gekiere, who is a Ph.D. student at the University of Oregon studying English and environment, adds that 鈥渕odern dystopian literature really became popular when I was an early teen, [and] so much of my experience with dystopian literature is shaped by the cultural moment I grew up [in].鈥�&苍产蝉辫;

For some, Butler鈥檚 work is a direct commentary on social issues Gen Z is starting to experience for themselves. 

鈥淎ll of Butler鈥檚 work focuses very specifically on hierarchical power and how it affects us. She shows its effects on our jobs, households, and relationships, and how we can cope with these unequal power relations,鈥� says Killian, a 22-year-old from Atlanta, Georgia, who first learned about Butler in a high school English class. 鈥淢any of us living in this year are intimately familiar with the coming of climate change, the perils of deregulation, the dehumanization of the homeless, and drug abuse,鈥� he says in an email interview, all problems that have grown in prominence since the novel鈥檚 publication.

Butler makes clear that accepting doomsday is not the novel鈥檚 intention. 鈥淲ithout adaptability, what remains may be channeled into destructive fanaticism. Without positive obsession, there is nothing at all,鈥� Butler writes on the first page of the book right below the year, 2024.

Tied to the corporate damage of the suburban west, Butler alludes to the L.A. tech boom of the 鈥�90s when writing about Olivar, a city comprised entirely of workers who live in subsidized housing owned by corporations as payment for working in their respective industries. Lauren鈥檚 best friend鈥檚 family leaves Robledo to work in Olivar in exchange for corporate safety and to escape persecution. Lauren describes this 鈥渨orking model鈥�:

Anyone KSF hired would have a hard time living on the salary offered. 鈥he new hires would be in debt to the company. That鈥檚 an old company-town trick鈥揼et people into debt, hang on to them, and work them harder. 

Butler imagines a society in which everything is privatized, and while America doesn鈥檛 yet have corporate-owned cities, one can imagine such a result from late-stage capitalism.

For 27-year-old Zachari Brumaire from California, Butler鈥檚 work resonates as 鈥渓iterature about dealing with exploitation and having one鈥檚 labor used to further the ill effects of capitalism and colonialism and patriarchy against [one鈥檚] will, and how to survive and resist that.鈥� Brumaire is studying political philosophy and religion and runs the Butler-inspired blog , where he publishes fiction and essays. 

鈥淎s a young person鈥攂ecoming politically aware during the Great Recession, stuck in a world with awful work and a collapsing climate and rising food prices and health care prices, and no real institutional resistance to COVID and genocide鈥攅verything is so incredibly bleak,鈥� he adds. 

Lauren often critiques her association as a political pawn of those in power, categorizing the acts of the arsonists as 鈥減olitical statements,鈥� while she struggles to find a spot in the vanishing middle class. 

Some kind of insane burn-the-rich movement. 鈥e鈥檝e never been rich, but to the desperate, we looked rich. We were surviving and we had our wall. Did our community die so that addicts could make a help-the-poor political statement? 

A larger part of Parable of the Sower is when the characters walk on Highway 101 and I-5 North to Oregon and Washington, where more water and stability are found. Butler outlines a larger class divide that stems from climate change ravaging the community. 

鈥淥ctavia Butler intentionally never drove a car. This moment, where the infrastructure we have today fails the people of the future (and people of the present) because of environmental and socioeconomic changes, challenges how we build our world now. In the context of a carless society, this road becomes a wasteland, filled with paranoid groups walking the asphalt with no shade,鈥� says Gekiere.

Parable of the Sower nails the coffin on the climate crisis. Early in the book, Lauren argues with her father on the privilege of being able to ignore something. 鈥淏ut Dad, that鈥檚 like 鈥gnoring a fire in the living room because we鈥檙e all in the kitchen,鈥� she points out. 

Readers soon learn that the fire is also in the kitchen. In a water-scarce community, water takes the form of modern-day currency, costing 鈥渟everal times as much as gasoline鈥� and being 鈥渁s good as money,鈥� according to Lauren. In Chapter 16, Butler鈥檚 protagonist says:

But 鈥� I thought something would happen someday. I didn鈥檛 know how bad it would be or when it would come. But everything was getting worse: the climate, the economy, crime, drugs, you know. I didn鈥檛 believe we would be allowed to sit behind our walls, looking clean and fat and rich to the hungry, thirsty, homeless, jobless, filthy people outside.

Self-described by Butler as a 鈥渃autionary tale,鈥� Parable is a harrowing model of what lies in the future and is already, to an extent, being realized in the present. 

To Brumaire, the book is 鈥渘ot so much a cautionary tale as a warped mirror of where we already are.鈥� He adds, 鈥淚t probably was a cautionary tale when it was written, but the authoritarianism and exponential climate collapse and fortress society aspects are, I think, already largely in place.鈥�

Lauren knows her belief system is incompatible with that of her family, and combined with the drug-related attacks and climate catastrophes that await her in L.A., she decides to escape. 

鈥淭he Quest of the North,鈥� or in Lauren鈥檚 case, Canada, is a recurring motif in the novel, alluding to migration from South to North America. The North has always represented a sort of progress, for migrants on the southern border of the United States; for Lauren, who escapes to Canada, it represents change. 

While Butler uses the walled communities and Robledo鈥檚 class divide as recurring themes throughout the book, she doesn鈥檛 present these ideas without solutions. Instead, she relies on Earthseed, a push for change. This aspect is often left out of reviews that point out the comparisons between Butler鈥檚 2024 and the 2024 we live in today.  

The opening of Chapter 9 reads, 鈥淎ll struggles Are essentially power struggles,鈥� and in Chapter 14, Butler writes, 鈥淭o rise. From its ashes A phoenix. First. Must Burn.鈥� Earthseed is about oppression and how to fight it.

For readers making these connections and wondering whether they can be translated into systems that work, the question arises, is it easier to imagine the end of the world than to build a socialist framework?

鈥淚 find that the way Butler was thinking about the extinction of humanity in Dawn [another book by Butler] resonates immensely with our current ecological and sociopolitical state,鈥� says Gen Witter, a 25-year-old from Oregon who first read Butler in a college class at Arizona State University. After being 鈥渦nable to put it down鈥� while pursuing their master鈥檚 degree, Witter explained how Butler inspired them to pursue a Ph.D. 鈥淔or me, Butler鈥檚 writing is not only trying to build worlds on the page but actively deconstructing the real world and the oppressive systems that exist within it through the stories she created.鈥�

For Witter and other readers of Butler鈥檚 work, Parable of the Sower is an awakening. 鈥淓ven though I want to look on the bright side, I refuse to be blindly complicit in systems that keep leading the most vulnerable members of our communities (and humanity, at large) toward death,鈥� Witter says. 

CORRECTION: This article was updated at 9:48 a.m. PT on July 22, 2024, to correct Jordan Yanowitz’s name. Read our corrections policy here.

This story is about skateboarders who identify as anything but men. Which isn鈥檛 to say that men who skateboard are bad. Many are good. Super, even. Fantastic! But it鈥檚 time to tell some different stories. To set some records straight. To recognize and historicize the female, queer, bi, and nonbinary humans responsible for today鈥檚 more equitable skate culture.

Nothing exists in a vacuum; societies and political constructs are reflections of their respective eras. It鈥檚 what calls the 鈥渋mmense entanglement of everything鈥濃�攖he idea that everything affects everything affects everything else. Even rebel things like skateboarding have long reflected, and been a reflection of, the world around them: In the 鈥�70s it personified the punk-rock, lock-up-your-daughters, middle-finger-to-the-Man ethos.

In the 鈥�80s it was fingerless gloves, parachute pants, neon graphics, and synthetic beats. In the 鈥�90s it channeled New York City鈥攇raffiti, hip-hop, and a high-low street style personified by the Supreme shop on Lafayette, where hip-hop and incense wafted out the open doors onto the sidewalk, erasing the division between public and private space.

And in all those decades, skateboarding mirrored/reflected not only pop culture, but the sexist, homophobic framework surrounding it. Women were excluded entirely or welcomed to get paid mind-numbingly less for skating the same contests as men, just as women in corporate America got paid less than their male peers and were barred from the C-suite.

Rarely did you see a woman鈥檚 name in a skate video鈥攅ither on a deck or behind the lens鈥攖he same way a woman鈥檚 name rarely graced the top line of a Hollywood film under the title 鈥減roducer鈥� or 鈥渄irector.鈥� And there were no gay skaters. At least, no out gay skaters. Like the rest of the world, skateboarding considered anyone who wasn鈥檛 straight an aberration.

Sometime within the past decade, though, skateboarding stopped moving in lockstep with the world around it and started resembling the dissenters it had long professed to rep, rejecting the stupid status quo to include whoever, and dress however, they wanted. It鈥檚 these genuine outcasts who are at the heart of this story, their collective story anchored by the personal experiences of four skaters, each with a vastly different relationship to skate culture:

fell in love with skateboarding at the age of 8, a precocious phenom breaking records and taking names, until their talent threatened to destroy their life. 

grew up skating in a tiny town in Iowa. She liked how she didn鈥檛 have to pretend to be someone else when she skated. She had zero designs on fame. When it happened, she was more surprised than you.

was raised to look hot, nab a husband, have kids, and live happily ever after. At the age of 21, she stepped onto a skateboard and found a more inspired happily ever after. That is, until, as in all fairy tales, the wolves showed up at her door.

And then there鈥檚 , a real-life rebel teen heroine with a lapful of gold medallions, getting into catfights, crying in secret; misunderstood. All she wanted to do, forever, was skate with her friends. She鈥檇 like it if her sponsors liked her, but in 2003, no one in the skate industry knew what to do with a rebel girl. If you鈥檙e one today, you owe Vanessa a thank-you card.

But for all their differences, every one of these skaters fell in love with the same thing: a piece of wood with four wheels, two trucks, some kingpins, nuts, and bolts. They all loved that thing so badly that even when it didn鈥檛 love them back they kept returning to it. And that鈥檚 how they broke the mold. By refusing to slot neatly into a nebulous collection of preordained boxes, and instead, fighting for their space in the world鈥攚hich, contrary to popular belief, there鈥檚 enough of to go around.

The first rule of fight club is you do not talk about fight club.

When I started writing about this topic in the summer of 2020, I didn鈥檛 know the club existed. And then my niece skateboarded down to meet me at the surf break. The world was in lockdown, and everything was the worst. But that day, after teaching her to turtle roll against the cold, crashy waves, she showed me how to tic tac across the pebble-pocketed road, and everything was the best(ish). 

We鈥檇 never bonded over anything before and suddenly were inseparable, pushing each other to try things that scared us on boards. Things that left us breathless and bruised, smiling bigger than ever.

I said, Let鈥檚 have a sleepover!

The night she showed up at my place we decided to only watch movies that featured girls surfing and girls skating.

Skateboarding has recently weathered a number of significant changes. Most controversial was the one-time fringe subculture being catapulted onto the world stage as a result of being in the Olympics. In response, a new era of skateboarding sprung up鈥攐ne too young to know its past, much less the parts that have seldom been told.

So before things go any further and the history of skateboarding is forever cemented in myopia, here are some stories that tell a different tale. And sometimes the same tale, from a different perspective, with the same rapturous fervor.

鈥淥ften, if you want to write about women in history, you have to distort history to do it, or substitute fantasy for facts,鈥� said historical novelist Hilary Mantel. This story is meant to avoid future historians having to make shit up.

This excerpt, adapted from by Deborah Stoll (Dey Street Books, 2024), appears by permission of the publisher.

So opens the first 鈥淟esbian Health鈥� segment on , a lesbian feminist television series that aired on New York鈥檚 public access stations from 1993 to 2006.

The half-hour program focused on lesbian activism, community issues, art and film, news, health, sports, and culture. Created by three artist-activists鈥擟uban playwright Ana Simo, theater director and producer Linda Chapman, and independent filmmaker Mary Patierno鈥�Dyke TV was one of the first TV shows made by and for LGBTQ women.

While many people might think LGBTQ representation on TV began in the 1990s on shows like and , LGBTQ people had already been producing their own television programming for decades.

In fact hundreds of LGBTQ public access series produced across the country.

In a media environment historically hostile to LGBTQ people and issues, LGBTQ people created their own local programming to shine a spotlight on their lives, communities, and concerns.

Experimentation and Advocacy

On this particular health segment on Dyke TV, a woman proceeds to give herself a cervical exam in front of the camera using a mirror, a flashlight, and .

Close-up shots of this woman鈥檚 genitalia show her vulva, vagina, and cervix as she narrates the exam in a matter-of-fact tone, explaining how viewers can use these tools on their own to check for vaginal abnormalities. Recalling the ethos of , Dyke TV instructs audiences to empower themselves in a world where women鈥檚 health care is marginalized.

Because public access TV in New York was relatively unregulated, the show鈥檚 hosts could openly discuss sexual health and air segments that would otherwise be censored on broadcast networks.

, many of the producers of LGBTQ public access series experimented with genre, form, and content in entertaining and imaginative ways.

LGBTQ actors, entertainers, activists, and artists鈥斺�攁ppeared on these series to publicize and discuss their work. Iconic drag queen , where The American Music Show gave him a platform to promote his burgeoning drag persona in the mid-1980s:

The producers often saw their series as a blend of entertainment, art, and media activism.

Shows like and were tongue-in-cheek satires of 1950s game shows. News programs such as , which broadcast its first episode in 1985, reported on local and national LGBTQ news and health issues.

Variety shows like in the 1970s, in the 1980s, and in the 1990s combined interviews, musical performances, comedy skits, and news programming. Scripted soap operas, like , starred amateur gay actors. And on-the-street interview programs like used drag and street theater to spark discussions about LGBTQ issues.

Other programs featured racier content. In the 1980s and 鈥�90s, , , and incorporated interviews with porn stars, clips from porn videos, and footage of sex at nightclubs and parties.

Skirting the Censors

The regulation of sex on cable television has long been .

But regulatory loopholes inadvertently allowed sexual content on public access. This allowed hosts and guests to talk openly about gay sex and safer sex practices on these shows鈥攁nd even demonstrate them on camera.

The impetus for public access television was similar to the ethos of public broadcasting, which sought to create noncommercial and educational television programming .

In 1972, the requiring cable television systems in the country鈥檚 top 100 markets to offer access channels for public use. The FCC mandated that cable companies make airtime, equipment, and studio space to individuals and community groups to use for their own programming on a first-come, first-serve basis.

The FCC鈥檚 regulatory authority does not extend to editorial control over public access content. For this reason, repeated attempts to block, regulate, and censor programming throughout the , , and were .

The that attempt to censor cable access programming on First Amendment grounds. that contains 鈥渙bscenity,鈥� but what counts as obscenity is up for interpretation.

Over the years, producers of LGBTQ-themed shows have fiercely defended their programming from calls for censorship, and the law has consistently been on their side.

Airing the AIDS Crisis

As the AIDS crisis began to devastate LGBTQ communities in the 1980s, public access television grew increasingly important.

Many of the aforementioned series devoted multiple segments and episodes to discussing the devastating impact of HIV/AIDS on their personal lives, relationships, and communities. Series like , , and were specifically designed to educate and galvanize viewers around HIV/AIDS activism. With HIV/AIDS receiving 鈥攁nd a 鈥攖hese programs were some of the few places where LGBTQ people could learn the latest information about the epidemic and efforts to combat it.

The long-running program is one of the few remaining LGBTQ public access series; new episodes air locally in New York and nationally via Free Speech TV each week. While public access stations , production has waned since the advent of cheaper digital media technologies and streaming video services in the mid-2000s.

And yet during this media era鈥攍et鈥檚 call it 鈥減eak public access TV鈥濃�攖hese scrappy, experimental, sexual, campy, and powerful series offered remarkable glimpses into LGBTQ culture, history, and activism.

This article is republished from under a Creative Commons license. Read the .

Here, lush date palms once shadowed a serene oasis called La Source Bleue: shallow pools that filled naturally from the underground aquifer. Until 2021, this oasis was a popular tourist destination and a cultural hub for Indigenous Amazigh communities, the nomadic tribes who have lived in Morocco鈥檚 desert regions for centuries. 

鈥淭he oases are truly a source of life for the nomads who live in the Dr芒a-Tafilalet region and the entire Moroccan desert,鈥� says Mustapha Tilioua, an anthropologist of Amazigh descent and professor at the nonprofit Tarik Ibn Zayad Center for Studies and Research in Errachidia, a half-hour drive from Meski. La Source Bleue, he says, was 鈥渢he heart of the oasis.鈥�

For the past three years, climate-change-induced drought across much of Morocco has hit places like Meski especially hard. Now, La Source Bleue is dry, its low walls crumbling into an empty basin. Scarce drinking water has forced Amazigh families to relocate to urban centers with more reliable water resources for themselves and the livestock on which they depend. 

Tourism has likewise dried up, causing a loss of income for the more than 20 families who have depended on La Source Bleue for their livelihood. 

But amid the silence, there is music. In a medina near La Source Bleue, an Amazigh musician is trying to revive Meski鈥攁nd his community鈥檚 heritage鈥攚ith the sounds of the desert. Mouloud Amrini, who performs under the name Meskaoui, hopes to use what he calls 鈥渆nvironmental music鈥� to help his community attract visitors. 

鈥淭he music that I play [is like when] I walk throughout the desert,鈥� Meskaoui says.

Meskaoui first founded his Gallery of Music Mouloud Meskaoui in 2009 to educate people about Amazigh musical traditions and nomadic music from around the world. It is supported in part by the Tarik Ibn Zayad Center, where Tilioua teaches Amazigh cultural history. 

On average, Meskaoui says the gallery receives about 800 to 1,000 visitors a year鈥攁 mix of international visitors and fellow Moroccans. That鈥檚 far fewer than before the oasis dried up, but he says its purpose remains vital. 

Meskaoui鈥檚 gallery is part of a wider goal to preserve what Tilioua calls a 鈥渞ich regional heritage for future generations.鈥� Some of Tilioua鈥檚 students have Amazigh lineage but lack a connection to their identity鈥攖he result of many years of government-led marginalization. That鈥檚 why he established the Sijilmassa Museum: Crossroads of Civilizations, with photographs, instruments, clothing, and other relics that show the diversity within Amazigh tribal history.

Tilioua and Meskaoui鈥檚 partnership started 20 years ago when they went on tour together to introduce nomadic Amazigh music to the world, performing in Saudi Arabia, China, Peru, Paraguay, Mexico, Mali, Timbuktu, Egypt, and elsewhere. Soon enough, they began to host musicians in Meskaoui鈥檚 gallery.

Mandolins, West African djembe drums, tambourines, electric guitars, keyboards, and other souvenirs from Meskaoui鈥檚 travels crowd the walls of his performance room, where he and other musicians play improvisations that blend elements of Amazigh music with their own styles. 

For Meskaoui and Tilioua, the message is simple. 

鈥淚t鈥檚 a call for peace in the world,鈥� Tilioua says, 鈥渂etween peoples and civilizations and all cultures.鈥�&苍产蝉辫;

Interviews were conducted in English, French, Arabic, and Darija. French translation was done by Marlowe Starling and Arabic and Darija translation was done by Rana Morsy. 

The reporting for this article was made possible by New York University鈥檚 GlobalBeat program.

, a documentary by , Emmy-nominated director of , intricately examines the evolution of racist attitudes and actions toward Black music genres that spans centuries, connecting the current legal weaponization of rap music to a long-standing history of Black musical genres being deemed immoral and illegal.

鈥淎t every stage of a new Black [musical] genre being made, it was stifled,鈥� Harper says. 鈥淚t was bringing white and Black people together. It was erasing these fabricated racial boundaries that allowed one people to oppress another. That was, and still is today, a very contentious thing to do. So why are lyrics used in this way? There鈥檚 400 years of history to go through to answer that question.鈥�

During the trans-Atlantic slave trade, enslaved people used song as a way to hold onto home, hope, and culture. While working in fields, Negro spirituals often disguised hidden messages that could be sung in front of plantation owners. Following the , the largest rebellion by enslaved people in the British mainland colonies, in 1740, banning drums and citing them as a tool of insurrection.

There were also protest songs in the rhythm and blues era. Both jazz music, which emerged in criminalized places like brothels and speakeasies, and rock 鈥檔鈥� roll (before it was stolen from Black artists like  and appropriated by artists like Elvis Presley) were demonized. During the civil rights movement, soul music was a clear outlet for Black voices to be heard, like James Brown鈥檚 鈥溾��&苍产蝉辫;

Hip-hop followed shortly after, emerging from the underground scene and quickly growing into a whole new genre and culture that encapsulated DJing, graffiti, breakdancing, and eventually rap, born out of frustration and chaos of negligent social structures within the South Bronx, New York. Sally Banes, one of the first journalists to , described it as 鈥渞itual combat that transmutes aggression into art.鈥�

Hip-hop and rap created an outlet for battles to diffuse nonviolently, repurposing struggle to provide social mobility while being therapeutic, and providing systemic critique and social commentary that was upfront, anti-establishment, and anti-police. It鈥檚 no surprise that the genre鈥攚hich includes which can be viewed as political speech鈥攈asn鈥檛 been received well by institutions. As Harper says, 鈥淣o system of entrenched power wants to be questioned [or] threatened in such a way.鈥�

Lyrics read during court, isolated from music and meaning, is undeniably an attack on the art form. Rap is embedded with metaphors, allegories, double entendres, and references to other musicians鈥� bodies of work, which can easily be misinterpreted or misunderstood. 

鈥淭he only voices that are speaking are the district attorney, the prosecutor,鈥� Harper says. 鈥淭he only person who鈥檚 silent in that whole constellation of people is the rap artist, the person on trial. It just seemed so bizarre that the person who was at the center of the circus was quiet, and these are people who live for the stage.鈥�

Harper was inspired to create the documentary after reading Erik Nielson and Andrea L. Dennis鈥� 2019 book,, which is full of testimonies from people whose lives were forever changed because of this prosecutorial tactic. Nielson and Dennis estimate that in 95% of cases where lyrics were admitted into evidence, the defendant was a Black or Latino man.

Nielson, a professor of liberal arts at the University of Richmond, focused his Ph.D. research on the policing of Black creative expression in the United States from antebellum South to the present day. He has since testified, on behalf of defendants, in more than 100 cases.

鈥淚 really see the prosecution of rap as a trap,鈥� Nielson says. 鈥淵ou systemically put people in circumstances where they have very few ways out. You dangle a couple of options, and then if you pursue one of those options, you slam the door as soon as they take it.鈥�

is a living example of this. While performing at a show in Louisiana in 2000, a fight broke out that eventually resulted in gunfire. Knowing his family was in the audience, Phipps drew his firearm for protection, leading to him being identified as the primary suspect. There was a lot of conflicting evidence: Phipps鈥� gun was never fired, there was no forensic evidence tying him to the crime was uncovered, witnesses changed their stories, and a description of the shooter didn鈥檛 resemble Phipps. Even after another man confessed to the crime, Phipps was still charged with first-degree murder and sentenced to 30 years, despite having no previous criminal record.

The real incrimination came in the courtroom, when a prosecutor presented lyrics from two of his songs. The prosecutor spliced them together, one from a battle rap and another rap referencing his father鈥檚 experience as a Vietnam vet, to create a more violent verse that Phipps had never spoken nor written. Phipps served 21 years, refusing to accept parole because he would not say he was guilty for a crime he did not commit, before being granted clemency by Louisiana Gov. John Bel Edwards in April 2021.

鈥淚t almost seems ridiculous when a judge is reading a lyric out, divorced from its music [and] its context,鈥� Harper says. 鈥淚t鈥檚 very easy to mischaracterize that music. And it just totally ignores the fact of the tradition of hip-hop, of lyrics passed from one song to another, or one artist to another.鈥�

Even with the First Amendment, Nielson says artists鈥� creative expressions are able to be criminalized because in most cases it鈥檚 not the lyrics themselves being punished. A crime is being punished, and the speech is used to establish involvement. If the actual lyrics are being punished, it鈥檚 because they鈥檝e been deemed a threat.聽

Yet Johnny Cash, who sang, 鈥淚 shot a man in Reno just to watch him die,鈥� and Freddie Mercury, who famously belted, 鈥淢ama, just killed a man / Put a gun against his head / Pulled my trigger now he鈥檚 dead,鈥� are beloved. Authors who write horror or crime novels are not accused of being killers because they possess the knowledge to write about it. There鈥檚 a clear distinction between author and narrator that is respected and not questioned.

Hip-hop artists aren鈥檛 afforded that same distinction because, as Harper sees it, there鈥檚 a cultural disbelief in the idea that Black people have the intelligence and creativity to create anything besides a direct account of their life, failing to see the 鈥渂rilliance and poetry鈥� of rap. 

Rap has grown into a radical tool for social mobility, allowing communities who鈥檝e been systematically oppressed and excluded the opportunity to get rich relatively quickly. When asked whether he believes prosecutors are using this tactic to stifle social mobility, Nielson said, 鈥淚n some instances, maybe knowingly [or] subconsciously, I see this as an attempt to check these young men. As a way to say, 鈥楻emember who you are. Know your place.鈥欌��&苍产蝉辫;

鈥淭oo often, prosecutors are not really focused on a just outcome. They are focused on a win. And for them, a win is a conviction,鈥� Nielson continues. 鈥淎ny kind of foothold they can get, they鈥檙e going to use it. It鈥檚 a combination of much broader systemic inequalities and racism, but also just the nature of what it means to be a prosecutor in the American criminal legal system.鈥�

While prosecutors use lyrics to incarcerate rappers, there are also many cases in which lyrics are used against people with no ties to an alleged crime or even to the music itself. Just being in the background of a music video or having lyrics from a favorite rapper scribbled in a notebook can be enough for prosecutors. 

Thanks to visibility sparked from Young Thug鈥檚 trial, there鈥檚 hope that this heightened attention can be used to address inequities in the criminal legal system. In 2023, Georgia Rep. Henry C. Johnson reintroduced the , a first-of-its-kind federal legislation that attempts to limit prosecutors鈥� ability to use creative expression as evidence in criminal trials.

However, in order for the legislation to be truly effective, Nielson says it needs to be implemented on both a federal and state level. California, which has seen the most cases of lyrics introduced as evidence, passed . Although it isn鈥檛 the strictest legislation, it鈥檚 a start. A New York state law, passed in the senate, limits the admissibility of lyrical or creative evidence. In March, the of an incarcerated man whose lyrics were used in his trial.

Harper is hopeful that legislators on both sides of the aisle can come together to address this issue. For Republicans, it is an issue of freedom of speech. For liberals, it is an issue of racial justice. 

鈥淭here鈥檚 a rare opportunity for there to be agreement that this is something that shouldn鈥檛 be happening constitutionally,鈥� Harper says. 鈥淭he system won鈥檛 correct itself. Prosecutors鈥� job is to win with any tool in front of them. It鈥檚 a matter of making this tool less available, so that it鈥檚 not so easy to abuse and put people away wrongfully.鈥�

Since it鈥檚 an election year, Nielson is encouraging people to be vigilant about local elections. As We Speak discusses the case of Drakeo the Ruler, an influential rapper who was wrongly incarcerated for three years. The day after Jackie Lacey, the former district attorney for Los Angeles, was removed from office and replaced with George Gasc贸n, he was . (Drakeo鈥檚 freedom only lasted a year; in 2021.) 

Nielson is hopeful that this prosecutorial tactic can be thwarted through continuous conversation and education about this issue and pressuring elected officials to pass legislation. However, in the meantime, rappers have begun censoring their own work, starting music videos with self-protective disclaimers.

鈥淭hese artists attesting to the fictional nature of their lyrics, combined with all the disclaimers you now see on these videos [stating that] everything here is a prop,鈥� Nielson says. 鈥淎ll of it reveals the sort of specter of the law hanging right over what they鈥檙e doing and their awareness that they are being watched. A mistake could be tragic for them. That to me, is not a healthy way for art to evolve.鈥�

As the survivor of domestic abuse perpetrated by my, if you had asked me before reading the novel if it was OK to imbue humor into the discourse surrounding domestic abuse, I would have said, 鈥淗ell no.鈥� But Casale doesn鈥檛 make light of violence; instead, she uses humor as an advocacy tool to illuminate a grim truth: Too often, the legal system rather than abusers. To stay safe and out of prison, women frequently have to (green thumb or not) take matters into their own hands.

If that鈥檚 too dark a thought, Casale gets it. 鈥淧eople don鈥檛 want to hear about the grim reality of male violence against women and girls,鈥� she writes in her author鈥檚 note. 鈥淭his novel is an attempt to use humor to cut through people鈥檚 reluctance to engage.鈥� If readers giggle along as Sally covers her husband鈥檚 body in cat litter to dry it out, sprinkling on some rice for good measure鈥斺�渏ust like our wedding day!鈥濃�攖hen they鈥檙e not looking away from domestic abuse. And that鈥檚 the whole point.

The Lockdown Ladies鈥� Burial Club never had the pandemic luxury of baking sourdough or tie-dyeing tees. If their common bond was a love of Agatha Christie mysteries鈥攔ather than surviving abuse鈥攖hey might have met in a virtual book club, cementing their friendship over wine-induced theories on how to get away with murder. Instead, they鈥檙e tasked with something much more difficult: figuring out how to avoid prison.

Women who claim self-defense against their abusers are than men who shoot strangers under. The law is more willing to side with a man who fires a gun at a nonviolent burglar than a woman who fights back against a husband who鈥檚 abused her for (as in Sally鈥檚 case) 20 years. That means Sally鈥檚 likely at fault, legally, when her husband, Jim, 鈥減unishes鈥� her for making his tea too light鈥攂y pouring boiling water over her hand鈥攁nd she reaches for her granny鈥檚 skillet to defend herself.

鈥淭here is a practical side of self-defense that can be empowering,鈥� says Shaunna Thomas, co-founder and executive director of UltraViolet, a feminist advocacy organization. 鈥淏ut the concept is often grounded in a misogynistic idea that women who are harmed are and are solely responsible for their own safety regardless of the circumstances.鈥�

In Sally鈥檚 case, the 鈥渃ircumstances鈥� seem pretty clear-cut: Jim attacked her, and she defended herself, accidentally killing him in the process. But 鈥渟elf-defense law was not created with women or victims of abuse in mind,鈥� says Elizabeth Flock, author of . Flock, an Emmy Award鈥搘inning journalist whose book examines what happens when, says the 鈥溾�� was 鈥渃reated by and for property-owning white men to protect their so-called 鈥榗astles.鈥欌��

If that sounds disgustingly patriarchal,, and outdated, that鈥檚 because it is. The law allows deadly force to protect your home but 鈥渄oesn鈥檛 account for women who defend themselves and their bodies against abusers who reside in their home and often have wielded violence for years,鈥� Flock says. The result? 鈥淲omen claiming self-defense often get convicted of murder or manslaughter, or take and end up spending years in prison.鈥�

More years, in fact, than men who kill their female partners. Abusive men who kill women face in prison, while women who kill men鈥斺�攁re sentenced to an average of. Unsurprisingly, prisons are filled with .

After Sally fights back, instead of calling the police, she eats some cake. Jim鈥檚 rotting on her kitchen floor, no longer capable of telling her she鈥檚 too fat or undeserving of treats. So she pours herself a glass of wine, grabs a bag of chips, and takes a bubble bath. The sense of relief and possibility Sally feels in Jim鈥檚 absence is overwhelming, so she makes a 鈥渂e happy鈥� list to extend her serotonin boost (bake! rescue a cat! get a job!). Then her 鈥済et rid of Jim鈥� list takes precedence, because if she waited this long to call the police, would anyone really believe she acted in self-defense?

鈥淚n a court of law, a woman can put her hand on a bible and swear to tell the whole truth, but if her word isn鈥檛 valued, the whole truth may not be heard,鈥� domestic violence court advocate Tonya GJ Prince says. Prince can still remember the haunting screams that pierced the courtroom 20 years ago when a survivor she was assisting played a recording of her violent attack. 

She was seeking a restraining order, but knew that without proof of violence, her request was likely to be denied. Her abuser was鈥攁s is often the case鈥攕een publicly as a 鈥渘ice guy.鈥�

鈥淲hen the recording ended, no one in the courtroom moved,鈥� Prince recalls. 鈥淚t was one of those moments where you had to remind yourself to breathe.鈥�

The judge granted the woman鈥檚 request for a restraining order, but not without chastising her 鈥渄ramatic and over-the-top鈥� screams. If that sounds familiar鈥攁nd sickening鈥攜ou may remember that Amber Heard鈥檚 of was seen not as but of her.

The inherent in our is why an NYPD detective told my mom in the 鈥�90s that the law couldn鈥檛 protect us from my father and that our only options were for my mom to either kill him or go into hiding with my sister and me. (She chose the latter, and if this sounds like a Lifetime Movie, it.)

New York didn鈥檛 have any stalking laws at the time, so my father鈥攁nd the hit man he hired鈥攚as free to hunt and terrorize us. Unless it became a murder case, there was nothing the cops could do. 

Before we escaped our home in Canada and fled to New York, my father attacked my mom outside his office in Michigan and threw her into oncoming traffic. He spent a single night in jail, and the felony assault case against him was dismissed in less than 30 minutes. Despite my horror-fueled objections, I was forced by court order to visit him. If my mom refused to hand me over, she would be held in contempt and possibly jailed.

Too often, the law protects abusive men and abused women, and the media aids and abets this abuse. Recently, The New York Times when it wrote鈥攖hen seemingly鈥攖hat O.J. Simpson鈥檚 鈥渨orld was ruined鈥� after being charged with killing his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson. Yet problematic language remains in the paper鈥檚 of Simpson鈥檚 obituary, which briefly mentions that he Brown Simpson鈥攚hom prosecutors said he 鈥攜et calls him 鈥渃ongenial鈥� and his marriage 鈥渟tormy.鈥澛燭he way the press has while is eerily reminiscent of the that failed Brown Simpson鈥攁nd continues to fail domestic violence survivors 30 years later.

In the U.S. legal system, only dead women鈥攚ho can鈥檛 speak up or defend themselves鈥攁re considered. My mom, thankfully, was not a perfect victim. Neither were Amber Heard or any of the members of fictional Lockdown Ladies鈥� Burial Club. These women didn鈥檛 only fight back; they survived.

鈥淚n this moment, after 100 years of erasure, false narratives, and racism built into the country industry, it鈥檚 important to shine a light on the Black co-creation of country music鈥攁nd creation is the correct word, not influence,鈥� Giddens writes. 鈥淏lack musicians, along with their working-class white counterparts, were active participants and creators, not empty vessels with good rhythm.鈥�

Sometimes these myths have been weaponized violently. Black country veterans, including , Charley Pride, and have shared their experiences performing in country music spaces, including the racial slurs and threats directed at them. For example, in his 1994 memoir, Pride writes about touring the U.S. South in the late 1960s, where some of the concert venues he played received bomb threats.

As both a Black fan and writer of country music criticism, I鈥檝e thought twice about bringing my child to a country music festival or concert with me, out of聽fear she might witness or be the target of another fan鈥檚 violence. But while criticisms of Beyonc茅 have sometimes gotten ugly (鈥檚 dehumanizing comparison of聽Beyonc茅 to a dog peeing against a tree to mark her territory is one particularly vivid example), in the wake of Cowboy Carter, listeners who might not have heard their stories told in mainstream country music are into the genre.

Black country artists, including Tanner Adell, Tiera Kennedy, Reyna Roberts, Willie Jones, Linda Martell, Brittney Spencer, and Shaboozey, who all appear on Cowboy Carter, have seen an uptick in and overall listenership on streaming services. Perhaps we could dub this the 鈥淏eyonc茅 Effect,鈥� a wave that lifts all who surround her, but Beyonc茅鈥檚 impact goes beyond opening the door wider for a handful of Black country artists.聽

Cowboy Carter also opens up conversations about Black creativity and imaginative freedom within country music and beyond, planting the seeds for deeper social change. On the album, Beyonc茅 cites and performs an expansive history of Black musical creativity, while also bringing her own unique energy and style. Throughout the album, Beyonc茅 channels Ray Charles鈥� showmanship and swinging reinterpretations that made his 1962 album, 鈥淢odern Sounds in Country and Western Music,鈥� a in the country genre.

You can especially hear her power to freshly reinterpret classics on her version of 鈥淛olene.鈥� We get the sunny optimism of Charley Pride鈥檚 鈥淜iss an Angel Good Morning,鈥� on 鈥淏odyguard,鈥� though it鈥檚 tweaked for modern times. (She even sings to her lover, 鈥淚 could be your bodyguard/ Please let me be your Kevlar (Huh)/ Baby, let me be your lifeguard/ Would you let me ride shotgun?鈥�) On 鈥�16 Carriages,鈥� Beyonc茅 tells a story of lost innocence and sacrifice as a young performer, echoing themes present in Allison Russell鈥檚 鈥淣ight Flyer,鈥� 鈥淧ersephone,鈥� and other songs about survival that appear on her 2021 album, 鈥淥utside Child.鈥�

On her tender lullaby 鈥淧rotector,鈥� performed with her daughter Rumi, Beyonc茅 promises to nurture her daughter鈥檚 light: 鈥淓ven though I know someday you鈥檙e gonna shine on your own/ I will be your projector.鈥� I hear a resonance with Black country songwriter Alice Randall鈥檚 wonderful 鈥淢y Dream,鈥� performed by Valerie June and included on the 2024 album, 鈥淢y Black Country: The Songs of Alice Randall.鈥�&苍产蝉辫;

We get the muscular country rock spirit of Tina Turner鈥檚 鈥淣utbush City Limits鈥� (especially of the song) on records like 鈥淵a Ya鈥� and 鈥淭exas Hold 鈥楨m.鈥� (I can imagine these songs as production numbers in the style of Tina Turner and Beyonc茅 herself, seeing as Beyonc茅 performed 鈥淧roud Mary鈥� with her icon at .)

And might Beyonc茅鈥檚 flirty duet with Miley Cyrus, 鈥淚I Most Wanted,鈥� (鈥淢aking waves in the wind with my empty hand/ My other hand on you鈥�) be the sequel (or prequel?) to Tracy Chapman鈥檚 鈥淔ast Car,鈥� a sapphic provocation from the shotgun seat, Luke Combs left behind in the dust? 鈥淚I Most Wanted鈥� is one of several songs on Cowboy Carter that speak to the centrality of stories of finding love and mobility in Black country, blues, and rhythm and blues music. Whether by horse, train, Cadillac, or Starship, Black music is shaped by stories of leaving, returning, and wandering to places known and unknown.

Beyonc茅鈥檚 crossing and melding, hybridizing and swirling on this album, has everything to do with reclaiming, an artistic action denied just about any Black artist who wants to make it in country music. For earlier Black artists like Bobby Womack, Millie Jackson, and Joe Tex, there has often been a double standard to 鈥渟tay in your lane,鈥� while white artists have been free to experiment, as Charles L. Hughes makes clear in his 2015 book, .

Cowboy Carter is a provocation, a new chapter, a clapback. It is not so much a rejection of the past as much as a sometimes-neck-popping conversation with that past, and with that, a rethinking of it. As both an improviser and re-interpreter, Beyonc茅 carries forward the tradition of African American art-making that is deeply invested in the changing same, bringing new energy to past songs. This spirit of circularity, a key African American aesthetic is evoked in the very first lyrics of the album: 鈥淣othing really ends/ For things to stay the same/ They have to change again.鈥�

In that way, we might see her as continuing a legacy of Black innovation in country music, whether it鈥檚 because of the ill fit of the instruments she inherited, the countrypolitan storytelling of Linda Martell, or the sex-positive grooves of Millie Jackson and Tanner Adell.

Ultimately, there is a kind of recovery at the heart of this album鈥攁 healing of the spirit of Black innovation in a genre that has worked so hard to repress it: 鈥淗ello, my old friend/ You change your name but not the ways you play pretend,鈥� Beyonc茅 sings in 鈥淎merican Requiem.鈥� A requiem is normally a mass for the dead, a ritual of remembrance. In traditional white and western ways of thinking, the purpose of a requiem is to lay souls to rest. But on this album, the purpose is to raise the dead, to animate histories and memories once forgotten, or misnamed.

This is an album meant to lift the lid off of the coffin of music that has grown stagnant. Like the exorcism that it is, this process of challenging old narratives and animating lost stories can be risky, vulnerable work. But perhaps it is time to abandon the old 鈥減retend鈥� narratives of 鈥渢hree chords and the truth鈥� to honor other stories, to conjure in order to set all of us free.